The Evidence

Scorecards, comparisons, and the questions that should be asked of both governments.

Assessment

Greenfield vs Brownfield โ€” The Case at a Glance

A side-by-side assessment across the criteria that matter most to the community.

๐Ÿš Brownfield Plan
$558M ยท 201 Borella Rd ยท Est. 2027
๐Ÿ— Greenfield Option
~$1.0โ€“1.5B net ยท New single site
Delivery & Timeline
โœ“ Now underway

Construction started 2024. Northeast Building due ~2027. Contractually committed and cannot be stopped.

โš  5โ€“10 years away

Would require site selection, land acquisition, planning approval, and a fresh design process before a single sod is turned.

Single-Site Consolidation (The Core Issue)
โœ— Not delivered

AWH's own CEO confirmed in writing it "will not deliver the Government's policy intent of a single-site hospital." Wodonga campus retained. The split-campus harm continues.

โœ“ Yes โ€” by design

All acute services on one site, eliminating the split-campus harm: staff driving between sites at night, duplicated anaesthesia, patient transfer mortality risk.

Clinical Safety โ€” Promised vs Delivered
โœ— Helipad removed

Helipad removed. ICU: unchanged capacity. Only 3 net new theatres. Cardiac catheter lab replaced with smaller unit. Promises made in 2022 progressively walked back.

โœ“ Purpose-built to standard

Designed from the ground up: correct ICU size, helipad, adequate theatres, no legacy constraints. Every clinical requirement met by design, not retrofitted.

2040 Capacity
โœ— Likely inadequate

10-year planning horizon (standard is 15โ€“20). ED presentations projected to double by 2040. New building may be at capacity before 2035.

โœ“ Can be built for growth

A greenfield designed on a 25โ€“30 year horizon would be sized for projected 2050 demand. Capacity staged into the design from the outset.

Federal Funding
โœ— 3.6% federal co-investment

Commonwealth contributed just $20M of $558M. Neither state minister wrote to the federal Health Minister seeking more. 6.7ร— less federal co-investment than Wagga Wagga per dollar spent.

~ Same problem โ€” structural

A greenfield would face the same cross-border IGA funding gap unless the IGA is renegotiated with the Commonwealth as a formal party. IGA reform is needed regardless of site choice.

Governance & Accountability
โœ— Unchanged structure

Cross-border IGA unchanged. Diffuse accountability continues. No Commonwealth obligation. Same governance that produced the current crisis.

โœ“ Opportunity to reset

A greenfield would require renegotiating the IGA โ€” creating a window to fix the structural accountability problem and establish federal obligations.

Community & Clinical Confidence
โœ— Crisis of confidence

120 doctors voted no-confidence. CEO resigned. Doctors escorted from the building. Farrer by-election produced One Nation's first ever House of Representatives seat.

โœ“ Clean slate potential

A new facility with governance reform offers a credible reset โ€” something the brownfield, built under the shadow of the current crisis, cannot easily deliver.

Scored 0โ€“10 against long-term community health outcomes

Brownfield (current plan)
Greenfield (single-site)
Clinical outcomes & single-site care
4/109/10

Dual-site maintenance limits clinical integration

Long-term capacity for population growth
4/109/10

Brownfield constrained by existing footprint; 2040 projections unmet

Construction disruption to patients
3/108/10

Staged brownfield build = multi-year service disruption

Value for money ($558M)
5/107/10

Brownfield costs comparable but delivers less capacity

Federal funding equity
2/102/10

Both options suffer the same 3.6% federal contribution โ€” structural problem

Governance & accountability
3/105/10

IGA reform needed regardless of site choice

Community & clinical confidence
3/108/10

BMA, 11 councils, 120-doctor no-confidence motion

The Evidence-Based Answer

What Actually Delivers the Best Outcome for the Albury-Wodonga Community

The greenfield case is clinically superior on almost every dimension that matters for long-term community health. But it is not achievable in the near term. The best realistic outcome is a sequenced strategy โ€” making the brownfield accountable while building the case for what comes next.

2027
Brownfield completes
Hold both governments to every original promise. Publish the Safer Care VIC review. Set measurable benchmarks before commissioning. Document every shortfall.
2026โ€“28
IGA renegotiation
Use the Farrer political window to push NSW, VIC and the Commonwealth to renegotiate cross-border governance. Fix the structural accountability failure.
2028โ€“30
Phase 2 in writing
Before the Northeast Building opens, get a formal funded commitment to Phase 2 achieving genuine single-site consolidation. Define what 'complete' means.
2030s
Single site delivered
As demand data confirms the brownfield is undersized, use documented evidence to secure greenfield or Phase 2 funding. Asset value of existing sites helps fund it.

The key finding

Federal Funding: AWH vs Comparable Hospitals

The single most striking finding. AWH's catchment is larger than Wagga Wagga's, yet receives 6.7ร— less federal co-investment as a percentage of total project cost.

Wagga Wagga Base Hospital

24%

Federal co-investment

Albury-Wodonga Health

3.6%

Federal co-investment ($20M of $558M)

HospitalProject CostBedsCatchmentFederal %Notes
Gold Coast University Hospital (QLD)~$1.8B924~650,000~22%Greenfield single-site. Built generously for growth. Needed expansion within 10 years.
Fiona Stanley Hospital (WA)~$2.0B783~550,000~15%Greenfield. Largest ever WA government building project. Single site from day one.
Royal Adelaide Hospital (SA)~$2.4B800~1.3M~12%Greenfield replacement. Largest PPP hospital in Australia at the time.
New Bendigo Hospital (VIC)~$630M372~320,000~18%Greenfield single-site 2016. Comparable regional Victorian city. No cross-border complications.
Wagga Wagga Base Hospital (NSW)~$700M380~240,00024%Multi-stage brownfield + new acute build. Similar regional catchment to AWH. Significant Commonwealth co-investment.
New Launceston General Hospital (TAS)$957M~400~250,000TBCGreenfield. Best current comparator for AWH โ€” similar catchment, under construction now.
Latrobe Regional Hospital (VIC)$280M200~110,000~15%Regional Victoria brownfield upgrade. Smaller catchment than AWH.
New Bankstown Hospital (NSW)$2.0BTBC~950,000TBCGreenfield, metro Sydney. Largest single hospital capital investment in NSW history. Est. 2031.
Albury Wodonga Health (AWH)AWH$558M+80 only~300,0003.6%Brownfield. Australia's only cross-border health service. Larger catchment than Wagga or Bendigo. 6.7ร— less federal co-investment than Wagga Wagga.

Unanswered

4 Questions the Community Should Be Asking

These are not rhetorical. Both state governments and the Commonwealth should be required to answer them publicly.

1. Why has federal co-investment in AWH been capped at 3.6% when comparable regional hospitals receive 15โ€“24%?

The Commonwealth has never publicly explained this discrepancy. AWH is the most complex cross-border health service in Australia.

2. Will the brownfield redevelopment deliver a functionally single-site service โ€” and if not, why was that language used in the announcement?

The CEO and Board Chair wrote to both ministers in December 2023 warning it would not. That letter has not been released.

3. What is the Phase 2 plan, and when will it be committed to in writing with federal funding?

Without Phase 2 commitment now, there is no enforceable path to single-site care in the planning horizon.

4. What structural reforms to the 2009 IGA are being considered to create clear accountability?

The current governance structure allows each government to shift responsibility. This must change regardless of which site plan proceeds.

Help us get answers. Sign the petition and contact your MP.

Take Action

Sources & References

  1. Hospital project costs โ€” respective state government announcements and health infrastructure project pages
  2. Federal funding percentages โ€” calculated from confirmed government announcements. Wagga Wagga: $67M Commonwealth ($55.1M HHF + $12M COAG) of $282.1M total (24%). Source: NSW Government Health Infrastructure
  3. AWH federal contribution: $20M of $558M (3.6%) โ€” 2023-24 Commonwealth Budget Papers; joint NSW/VIC October 2022 announcement
  4. Gold Coast University Hospital โ€” Queensland Health; QLD Government project documentation. Fiona Stanley Hospital โ€” WA Department of Health
  5. New Bendigo Hospital โ€” Victorian Government; Health Infrastructure Victoria project records
  6. New Launceston General Hospital โ€” Tasmanian Government infrastructure project page; $957M total confirmed 2023
  7. Scorecard ratings are evidence-based assessments by CHART researchers drawing on the 2021 AWH Clinical Services Plan, government project documentation, AMA/BMA clinical submissions, and FOI-obtained correspondence. They represent analysis, not official positions.
  8. Catchment population figures โ€” AWH official website; ABS Census data; respective state LHD/LHN planning documents
A Spotlight Initiative project โ€” public interest research for Australian communities